AVA lodges submission on the implementation of virtual fencing in NSW

In August 2025, the AVA provided a detailed submission to the NSW Government on the proposed introduction of virtual fencing (VF) for beef and dairy cattle. The AVA recognises that VF has significant potential to improve welfare, safety, and property management outcomes when used responsibly and within a clear regulatory framework.

The submission highlights several welfare benefits of virtual fencing, including reduced risk of injury from traditional wire fencing, greater flexibility during emergency situations, and the ability to protect sensitive environments such as riparian areas. The AVA strongly supports ensuring these benefits are reflected in any final regulatory approach.

A key recommendation is that virtual fencing must not replace physical external boundary fencing. The AVA emphasises that physical boundaries remain essential for public safety, biosecurity, and legal responsibility. VF should instead be restricted to internal property management, such as paddock subdivision and controlled grazing.

The submission outlines the need for safeguards where roads or laneways intersect properties. VF should never be used on public road boundaries without a physical fence, and users should receive guidance on safely managing virtual boundaries near access routes.

It was noted that not all cattle will learn the audio–correction cues used in VF systems. The AVA recommends mandatory monitoring during training, prompt removal of non-learners, and veterinary assessment where necessary to prevent ongoing stress or welfare compromise.

The AVA calls for consistent recording and reporting of device malfunction, excessive corrections, and other adverse events. This data will be critical for welfare research, compliance monitoring, and refinement of technology and training practices. The submission also recommends a formal review after two years and record-keeping for technology downtime.

The full submission can be accessed here.